Essays in English Literature 17801860 George Saintsbury Books
Download As PDF : Essays in English Literature 17801860 George Saintsbury Books
About the Book
Collections of Essays are anthologies that have been compiled in order to demonstrate the works of a number of essayists. The list of essayists who have been active throughout the world and throughout time, is extraordinary.
Also in this Book
The family saga chronicles the lives of a family, or several related or interconnected families, over an extended period of time. This may be in a novel or a sequences of novels with a serious theme, and is set against the background of historical events, changes of social circumstances, or the rise and fall of fortunes. The typical family saga follows a family through several generations in a series of novels.
And in this Book
A short story collection is a book that contains short stories written by a single author. It is distinguished from an anthology of fiction, which includes stories by more than one author.
About us
Leopold Classic Library has the goal of making available to readers the classic books that have been out of print for decades. While these books may have occasional imperfections, we consider that only hand checking of every page ensures readable content without poor picture quality, blurred or missing text etc. That's why we
- republish only hand checked books;
- that are high quality;
- enabling readers to see classic books in original formats; that
- are unlikely to have missing or blurred pages.
Happy reading!
Essays in English Literature 17801860 George Saintsbury Books
"... We have recently seen revived the sempiternal argument between authors and critics—an argument in which it may be as well to say that the present writer has not yet taken part either anonymously or otherwise. The authors, or some of them, have remarked that they have never personally benefited by criticism; and the critics, after their disagreeable way, have retorted that this was obvious."Best to start with some of Saintsbury's wit, because the table of contents is... daunting:
INTRODUCTORY ESSAY— The Kinds of Criticism ix
I. Crabbe 1
II. Hogg 33
III. Sydney Smith 67
IV. Jeffrey 100
V. Hazlitt 135
VI. Moore 170
VII. Leigh Hunt 201
VIII. Peacock 234
IX. Wilson 270
X. De Quincey 304
XI. Lockhart 339
XII. Praed 374
XIII. Borrow 403
APPENDIX— A. De Quincey 440 B. Lockhart 444
Some of these poets and essayists, like Crabbe and De Quincey, are also dealt with by Leslie Stephen and Augustine Birrell; but Saintsbury drills down even deeper:
"... The greatest of all critics was accused, unjustly, of having a certain dislike of clear, undoubted supremacy. It would be far more fair to say that Sainte-Beuve had eminently, what perhaps all critics who are not mere carpers on the one hand, or mere splashers of superlatives on the other, have more or less—an affection for subjects possessing but qualified merit, and so giving to criticism a certain additional interest in the task of placing and appraising them."
This book did take a long time to read. And another name for 'drilling down' is 'boring.' But I will give one more sample of Saintsbury at his best:
Indeed, the truth is that while this attitude has in some periods been very rare, it cannot be said to be the peculiar, still less the universal, characteristic of any period. It is a personal not a periodic distinction; and there are persons who might make out a fair claim to it even in the depths of the Middle Ages or of the nineteenth century. However this may be, Peacock certainly held the theory of those who take life easily, who do not love anything very much except old books, old wine, and a few other things, not all of which perhaps need be old, who are rather inclined to see the folly of it than the pity of it, and who have an invincible tendency, if they tilt at anything at all, to tilt at the prevailing cants and arrogances of the time. These cants and arrogances of course vary. The position occupied by monkery at one time may be occupied by physical science at another; and a belief in graven images may supply in the third century the target, which is supplied by a belief in the supreme wisdom of majorities in the nineteenth. But the general principles—the cult of the Muses and the Graces for their own sake, and the practice of satiric archery at the follies of the day—appear in all the elect of this particular election, and they certainly appear in Peacock.
Product details
|
Tags : Essays in English Literature, 1780-1860 [George Saintsbury] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. <h2>About the Book</h2> Collections of Essays are anthologies that have been compiled in order to demonstrate the works of a number of essayists. The list of essayists who have been active throughout the world and throughout time,George Saintsbury,Essays in English Literature, 1780-1860,Leopold Classic Library,B00VJQQZ5S,Fiction Family Life,Fiction Short Stories,Literary Collections Essays
People also read other books :
- ReForm School edition by TG Cooper Literature Fiction eBooks
- Breaking Free Siren Publishing Classic edition by Grae McTavish Literature Fiction eBooks
- The Premise A Novel To Save The World Andy Crossfield Books
- Beauty In The Beast Urban Fairytales Book 8 eBook Erik Schubach
- An Indecent Affair Part III eBook Stephanie Julian
Essays in English Literature 17801860 George Saintsbury Books Reviews
small text
Good because for free.
Great book
"... We have recently seen revived the sempiternal argument between authors and critics—an argument in which it may be as well to say that the present writer has not yet taken part either anonymously or otherwise. The authors, or some of them, have remarked that they have never personally benefited by criticism; and the critics, after their disagreeable way, have retorted that this was obvious."
Best to start with some of Saintsbury's wit, because the table of contents is... daunting
INTRODUCTORY ESSAY— The Kinds of Criticism ix
I. Crabbe 1
II. Hogg 33
III. Sydney Smith 67
IV. Jeffrey 100
V. Hazlitt 135
VI. Moore 170
VII. Leigh Hunt 201
VIII. Peacock 234
IX. Wilson 270
X. De Quincey 304
XI. Lockhart 339
XII. Praed 374
XIII. Borrow 403
APPENDIX— A. De Quincey 440 B. Lockhart 444
Some of these poets and essayists, like Crabbe and De Quincey, are also dealt with by Leslie Stephen and Augustine Birrell; but Saintsbury drills down even deeper
"... The greatest of all critics was accused, unjustly, of having a certain dislike of clear, undoubted supremacy. It would be far more fair to say that Sainte-Beuve had eminently, what perhaps all critics who are not mere carpers on the one hand, or mere splashers of superlatives on the other, have more or less—an affection for subjects possessing but qualified merit, and so giving to criticism a certain additional interest in the task of placing and appraising them."
This book did take a long time to read. And another name for 'drilling down' is 'boring.' But I will give one more sample of Saintsbury at his best
Indeed, the truth is that while this attitude has in some periods been very rare, it cannot be said to be the peculiar, still less the universal, characteristic of any period. It is a personal not a periodic distinction; and there are persons who might make out a fair claim to it even in the depths of the Middle Ages or of the nineteenth century. However this may be, Peacock certainly held the theory of those who take life easily, who do not love anything very much except old books, old wine, and a few other things, not all of which perhaps need be old, who are rather inclined to see the folly of it than the pity of it, and who have an invincible tendency, if they tilt at anything at all, to tilt at the prevailing cants and arrogances of the time. These cants and arrogances of course vary. The position occupied by monkery at one time may be occupied by physical science at another; and a belief in graven images may supply in the third century the target, which is supplied by a belief in the supreme wisdom of majorities in the nineteenth. But the general principles—the cult of the Muses and the Graces for their own sake, and the practice of satiric archery at the follies of the day—appear in all the elect of this particular election, and they certainly appear in Peacock.
0 Response to "[ZGT]≡ Read Gratis Essays in English Literature 17801860 George Saintsbury Books"
Post a Comment